RAVI ALIAS GOLO SON OF RAMHET v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/49/2025 · 2025-01-17
Ganesh Ram Meena
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2715 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2715 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2514] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application No. 49/2025 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No.51/2025 Ravi Alias Golu Son of Ramhet, Resident of Kolhukheda Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 17/01/2025
1. Learned
Public
Prosecutor
submits
that
the victim/complainant has already been intimated through the SHO, concerned Police Station in regard to filing and hearing of this appeal as well as the application for suspension of sentence.
2. The present suspension of sentence application has been filed by the appellant under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. against the
judgment dated 24.10.2024 passed by the Court of learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Commissions for Protection of Child Right Act, 2005, No.2, Baran in Sessions Case No.21/2021 (CIS No.51/2021) whereby, the appellant has been convicted for offence under Sections 363 & 120-B of IPC.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that during trial the accused-appellant was on bail and he never
[2025:RJ-JP:2514] (2 of 3) [SOSA-49/2025] misused the liberty of bail. Counsel further submits that the sentence imposed upon the accused-appellant has already been suspended by the Court below for a period of thirty days in view of provisions of Section 430 of B.N.S.S.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State assisted by counsel for the complainant have opposed this suspension of sentence application.
5. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record.
6. On consideration of submissions made by counsel for the accused-appellant so also the fact that the accused-appellant never misused the liberty of bail and taking into consideration the observations and findings of the trial Court, this Court finds that this is a fit case to suspend the sentence imposed upon the accused-appellant.
7. Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused- appellant- Ravi Alias Golu Son of Ramhet in Sessions Case No.21/2021 shall remain suspended on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court to the effect that he shall appear before the Registrar Judicial of this Court on 18.02.2025 and further on subsequent date(s) as and when called upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions as follows:- i. After release of the accused-appellant, he shall not indulge in any criminal activity and if it is found that he is involved in any criminal activity, the order shall be recalled.
[2025:RJ-JP:2514] (3 of 3) [SOSA-49/2025] ii. He will appear before the trial Court in the month of February of every year till the appeal is decided. iii. If the appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as the counsel in the High Court. iv. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
8. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court through e- mail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Satyendra/136