Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2715 (JHR)

PURNANAND JHA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

C.M.P./86/2025 · 2025-02-04

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

--1-- C.M.P. No. 86 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 86 of 2025 ---- 1. Purnanand Jha, aged about 74 years, S/o Dina Nath Jha, R/o Ward No.24, Near Matsya Vibhag Pandit B.N. Jha, Deoghar, PO and PS – Deoghar, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand 2. Hari Prasad Jha, aged about 70 years, S/o Dina Nath Jha, R/o Ward No.24, Near Matsya Vibhag Pandit B.N. Jha, Deoghar, PO and PS – Deoghar, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand 3. Ramji Jha, aged about 69 years, S/o Dina Nath Jha, R/o Ward No.24, Near Matsya Vibhag Pandit B.N. Jha, Deoghar, PO and PS – Deoghar, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- 1. State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand at Project Building, Ranchi, PO – Dhurwa, PS – Jagarnathpur, District – Ranchi 2. Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Dumka Division, Dumka, PO and PS – Dumka, District – Dumka 3. Charge Officer, Attestation Camp Mohanpur “A” PO and PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar 4. Baldev Mahto, S/o Late Avinash Mahto, R/o village – Bara, Panchayat Bara, PO – Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 5. Masudi Mahto, S/o Late Avinash Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 6. Ayodhya Mahto, S/o Late Avinash Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 7. Hukum Mahto, S/o Late Avinash Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 8. Nunu Mahto, S/o Late Avinash Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 9. Jalo Mahto, S/o Late Thakur Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 10. Karu Mahto, S/o Late Thakur Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. 11. Bhuvan Mahto, S/o Late Janki Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. --2-- C.M.P. No. 86 of 2025 12. Huran Mahto, S/o Late Janki Mahto, R/o Village – Bara, Pachayat – Bara, PO– Rikhiya, PS – Rikhiya, District – Deoghar, 814113. .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate :- Mr. Atma Ram Choudhary, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Krishna Kumar Bhatt, Advocate ---- 02/04.02.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondent State. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) No.362 of 2023 to its original file which has been dismissed for default on 22.08.2024 for non-compliance of the order dated 25.07.2024. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the certified copy could not be obtained within time and in view of that the certified copy has not been filed and since the order is peremptory one the W.P.(C) was dismissed. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no serious objection if the said W.P.(C) is restored to its original file. 5. This Court finds that sufficient cause has been made out for the restoration of W.P.(C) No.362 of 2023. As such W.P.(C) No.362 of 2023 is hereby restored to its original file. 6. This petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/