Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27148 (GAU)

SRI SUKUMAL NAMA DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3984/2025 · 2025-12-14

Nelson Sailo

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010264962025 2025:GAU-AS:17322 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3984/2025 SRI SUKUMAL NAMA DAS S/O LAKHI NAMA DAS, R/O VILLAGE-SANTIPUR, P,O-CHAPAR DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM,PIN-783301. 2: MOSHARF KHAN S/O LT. AKRAM KHAN OFFICE OF THE DIST. A H AND VETY. OFFICER DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 78330 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY . TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT., DISPUR 2:THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT. CENIKUTHI GUWAHATI 3 3:THE FODDER DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT. ASSAM GHY 03 4:THE DIST. ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783301 5:DIST. A.H. AND VETY. OFFICER Page No.# 2/3 A.H AND VETY DEPT. BONGAIGAON ASSAM. 6:THE DIRECTOR INSTITUTE OF FARM MANAGEMENT RANI KAMRUP A.H. AND VETY DEPT. ASSAM PIN 781101 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE INTENSIVE CATTLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SIBSAGAR A H. AND VETY DEPT. DEMOW ASSAM PIN 785640 8:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE INTENSIVE CATTLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TEZPUR A.H. AND VETY. DEPT. ASSAM PIN 78406 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K DAS, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. J K GOSWAMI, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 15-12-2025 Heard Mr. BK Das, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks deletion of the name of the applicant No.2/petitioner No.2, whose name is Mosharf Khan, in view of the fact that he does not like to press the review petition. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. DJ Baruah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. JK Goswami, learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above, the interlocutory application is disposed of as allowed and as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant