M/S EAST INDIA CONSTRUCTION v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
WP(C)/1816/2018 · 2025-12-14
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27141 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27141 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010058482018
2025:GAU-AS:17434
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1816/2018 M/S EAST INDIA CONSTRUCTION A PROPRIETORIAL FIRM, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI RAJIB HAZARIKA, S/O LT. PROBIN HAZARIKA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, A RESIDENT OF D-207, NEAR HOUSEFED COMPLEX, RUKMINIGAON, GUWAHATI AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ULUBARI, VILL AND P.O. ULUBARI,P.S. PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI- 781005. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003.
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DIVISION
SIVASAGAR WATER RESOURCES DIVISION
SIVSAGAR ASSAM 4:M/S ALI BROTHERS A PROPREITORAL CONCERN
Page No.# 2/3 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MATLIB ALI
S/O LT. SAMSER ALI R/O DHAI ALI NEAR BONIA BARI MASJID P.O. AND P.S. SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR PIN - 785640.
5:M/S CONSTRUCTION REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI PUNYA KALITA
P.O. ARJUNGURI NEAR DARBAR FIELD SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR PIN - 785640.
6:M/S M.P. AGARWALLA A PROPRIETORIAL CONCERN WITH ITS OFFICES AT A.T. ROAD BOKAKHAT TOWN
DIST. GOLAGHAT PIN - 785615 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.K. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate Mr. M. Sarma, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Tinglung, Standing Counsel Mr. S.K. Talukdar, Advocate
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 15.12.2025
Mr. M.K. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the instant writ petition has become
Page No.# 3/3 infructuous.
2. Ms. Tinglung, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Water Resources Department and Mr. S.K. Talukdar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 4.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant