Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27138 (ALL)

KANCHI SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/6778/2025 · 2025-03-20

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41756 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6778 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kanchi Sharma Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aishwarya Goswami,Pawan Giri Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ashish Malhotra,Rajesh Tripathi Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has passed High School Examination in the year 2014, but her date of birth in her High School Mark-sheet has wrongly been mentioned as '18.01.1999' in place of '18.01.1998'. In this respect, petitioner has submitted representation to the respondent no.2 but no heed has been paid on the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. In such view of the fact, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2-Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi through its Secretary along with a certified copy of this order, raising all her grievances within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously preferably within a period of two months thereafter. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 NS Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad