PREM PRAKASH SONI S/O LATE SHRI SITARAM SONI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5100/2024 · 2025-02-05
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27136 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27136 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5002] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5100/2024
1. Prem Prakash Soni S/o Late Shri Sitaram Soni, R/o Plot No. 112, Shri Radha Krishna Colony, Gokulpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Saroj Soni W/o Shri Prem Prakash Soni, R/o Plot No. 112, Shri Radha Krishna Colony, Gokulpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Mukesh Soni S/o Prem Prakash Soni, R/o Plot No. 112, Shri Radha Krishna Colony, Gokulpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Manisha Soni D/o Prem Prakash Soni, R/o Plot No. 112, Shri Radha Krishna Colony, Gokulpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Smt. Chanchal Soni W/o Shri Punam Chand Soni, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Plot No. 17, Meenakshipuram-A, Gokulpura, Kardhani, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yenu Satyan for Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi, through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 05/02/2025 Upon perusal of the order dated 12.09.2024, it is noted that respective sides have reached a mutual understanding and have agreed to reconcile their differences, with a view to live together in harmony putting an end to their matrimonial disputes. This Court, considering that ingredients of Section 498 A of IPC were
[2025:RJ-JP:5002] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5100/2024] invoked, has directed the investigating officer to keep a vigil qua the safety, security and peaceful life of the complainant and her daughter till the next date fixed for the matter.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after the order dated 12.09.2024, the petitioner, his wife and their daughter(s) are living in harmony and peacefully. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that there is no reason to continue the present litigation as the petitioner and non- applicant are living together in harmony. Howsoever, liberty is granted to the respective sides to approach this Court and revive the petition, if grievance inter-se them remains unresolved. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/38