PRAN DULLO AND OTHERS v. SHEIKH FAYAZ AHMAD COMMISSIONER SECRETARY FLORICULTURE DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/120/2025 · 2025-04-22
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2713 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2713 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CCP(S) No. 120/2025 IN SWP No. 297/2019
Pran Dulloo and Ors.
..... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Sumit Moza, Advocate
Vs
Sheikh Fazaz Ahmad Commissioner Secretary Floriculture Deptt. and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 22.04.2025
After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant contempt petition, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the instant contempt petition, as the same is time barred. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the dismissal of the instant contempt petition shall not come in the way of the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy before the respondents by way of a representation.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 22.04.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 5 Mihul Singh 2025.04.23 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document