Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.113
CWP-4583-2025 Date of decision : 07.04.2025
Rajender and others
.…. Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present : Ms.Mehak Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr.Ankur Mittal, Addl.A.G., Haryana, with
Mr.P.P.Chahar, Sr.DAG, Haryana, and
Mr.Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
* * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, she would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Panipat (respondent No.3) to take a decision on the representation (Annexure P-4), submitted by the petitioners.
2.
Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted.
3.
Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representation (Annexure P-4), submitted by the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
07.04.2025
[VIKRAM AGGARWAL] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.04.08 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh