[2025:RJ-JP:34862] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10051/2025 Nadeem Qureshi S/o Mehraj Qureshi, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 342-A, Aman Residency, Sanjay Nagar-D Jhotwara, Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10052/2025 Sahil Khan S/o Shri Shahid Ahmed, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No 7, Pathnon Ka Mohalla, Via Khandela, Dayara Rural, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Martand Pratap Singh Mr. Anirudh Tyagi For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/09/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.410/2025 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 308(4) & 140(3) of BNS, 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:34862] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10051/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that heated arguments on account of road accident has been converted into serious criminal offence. Counsel submits that as per paragraph 4 of the impugned order dated 04.08.2025, complainant has no objection if benefit of bail is granted to petitioner- Nadeem Qureshi. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submit that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the material available before me in the form of case diary, as also considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Nadeem Qureshi S/o Mehraj Qureshi and 2) Sahil Khan S/o Shri Shahid Ahmed shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a [2025:RJ-JP:34862] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10051/2025] personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /127-128