2025:JHHC:15810 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 88 of 2025 1. Nilkanth Prasad @ Nilkanth Nayak, S/o Late Hari Ram Nayak, Aged about 78 years, R/o Kasuwa Gomia, P.O. – Gomia, P.S. – I.E.L., District – Bokaro, Jharkhand- 829112. 2. Gulab Chand Prasad @ Gulab Chand Nayak, S/o Late Hari Ram Nayak, Aged about 75 years, R/o Kasuwa Gomia, P.O. Gomia, P.S. I.E.L., District Bokaro and at present residing at Village- Gomia Basti, P.O. + P.S. Gomia, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand – 829111. 3. Devendra Nayak, S/o Late Hari Ram Nayak, Aged about 70 years, R/o Gomia Kasuwa, Gomia, P.O. Gomia, P.S. I.E.L., District Bokaro and at present residing at 254, Gomia Basti, Village- Gomia, P.O. + P.S. – Gomia, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand – 829111. 4. Satyawan Kumar @ Satyawan Kumar Nayak @ Satoan Kumar Nayak, S/o Late Hari Ram Nayak, Aged about 64 years, R/o Kaswa Gomia, P.O. Gomia, P.S. I.E.L., District Bokaro and at present residing at C/8 ICI Colony, Gomia, P.O. – I.E. Gomia, P.S. – I.E.L. Gomia, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand – 829112. . … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Hazaribagh, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. 4. Circle Officer, Vishnugarh, P.O. and P.S. Vishnugarh, District – Hazaribagh. 2025:JHHC:15810 2 5. Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh, P.O. and P.S. – Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh. 6. Officer in Charge, Vishnugarh, P.O. and P.S. Vishnugarh, District – Hazaribagh. 7. In Charge Officer, Aijari Police Station, P.O. Aijari, P.S. Aijari, District – Hazaribagh. …… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Nischay, Advocate For the Respondent : ---------------------------- 06/Dated 13th June, 2025 1. The instant civil misc. petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 6835 of 2017, which stood dismissed on 27.09.2019 for non- compliance of the peremptory order dated 13.09.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 6835 of 2017, which stood dismissed on 27.09.2019 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 13.09.2019 may be restored to its original file otherwise the petitioners may suffer irreparable loss and injury. 3. None appears to oppose the prayer. 4. This Court, after having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, considering the submission advanced on his behalf and the reason assigned in the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition, deems it fit and proper to restore the writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 6835 of 2017, 2025:JHHC:15810 3 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 13.09.2019, to its original file. 5. In view thereof, the writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 6835 of 2017, is restored to its original file subject to removal of defects within two weeks. 6. Accordingly, the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Samarth/