State of Manipur and 3 Others v. Khangkhanlung @ Akhan Rongmei
MC(WA)/51/2025 · 2025-05-01
Ahanthem Bimol Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2712 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2712 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item No. 10(DB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(WA)No.51 of 2025
State of Manipur & 3 Ors. Applicants Vs.
Khangkhanlung @ Akhan Rongmei
Respondent
BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
02.05.2025 D. Krishnakumar, C.J. :
[1]
Mr. M. Rarry, learned senior counsel, appears for the applicants and Mr. D. Julius Riamei, learned counsel, appears for the sole respondent. [2]
The learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent fairly agreed that there is no objection for condoning the delay of 28(twenty eight) days in filing the appeal. [3]
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit, we are also satisfied with the said reasons stated in the affidavit. Therefore, the delay of 28(twenty eight) days in filing the appeal is condoned and the present application is allowed. [4]
Registry is directed to number appeal, if it is in order.
JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
John Kom
JOHN TELEN KOM Digitally signed by JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2025.05.05 08:59:08 +05'30'