Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27118 (KAR)

SRI PUTTARAMU v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/14912/2025 · 2025-06-12

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20184 WP No. 14912 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 14912 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI PUTTARAMU S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, MAYANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 120 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. KEMPE GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVANA MYSORE ROAD, RAMANAGARAM TOWN RAMANAGARAM - 562 159 Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20184 WP No. 14912 of 2025 3. TAHASILDAR AND TALUK MAGISTRATE MAGADI TALUK, MAGADI RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 120 4. REVENUE INSPECTOR, NADAKACHERI, MAGADI RAMANAGARAM TALUK - 562 120. 5. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, KALYA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 120 6. KALYA GRAMA PANCHAYATHI MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 120 REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYATHI DEVELOPMENT OFFICER … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) *** THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED HARAJ ISTHIHAR, DATED 02.05.2025 BEARING NO.ADM/CR/201/2025, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3- TAHASILDAR (ANNEXURE-A), FOR SALE OF EUCALYPTUS TREES GROWN/STANDING IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ALL FURTHER AND CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS THEREON AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20184 WP No. 14912 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal reading as hereunder: "The undersigned prays for permission to withdraw the above petition reserving liberty to challenge the impugned notice in pending civil proceedings in the ends of justice and equity." The memo is taken on record. 2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to take appropriate action against the impugned proceedings in the pending civil dispute. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP