Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27111 (RAJ)

DALPAT SINGH NARUKA S/O LT. SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH v. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (RIICO)

CW/12082/2025 · 2025-08-11

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31108] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12082/2025 Dalpat Singh Naruka S/o Lt. Shri Rajendra Singh, R/o D-180, Ram Marg, Hanuman Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Deputy General Manager (Investment) Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Mr. Avnish Bansal S/o Praveen Bansal, R/o C-110, Grud Marg, Hanuman Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Mr. Manvendra Singh Sesodia S/o Raghuveer Singh, R/o D-172, Kevat Marg, Pawan Path Hanuman Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajatshatru Mina, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gunjan Pathak, Adv. Mr. Ankit Totuka for RIICO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise the grievance before the concerned Court as per the provisions of Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, as petitioner has also moved an application seeking appropriate remedy before the Division Bench (Commercial) against the order of Commercial Court. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case and limited prayer so made by the learned counsel, liberty as prayed for, is granted. [2025:RJ-JP:31108] (2 of 2) [CW-12082/2025] Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. However, no prejudice will be caused to the petitioner on account of said withdrawal. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /10