Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27108 (RAJ)

MADAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/5500/2017 · 2025-07-24

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27840] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5500/2017 Madan Lal S/o Sh. Arjun Ram, aged about 59 years, R/o Gugara Post Gugara Tehsil Sikar District Sikar, Raj. At Present R/o Khatiko Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 8, Nawa City, District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Principal Secretary, Law Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Director Prosecution, Jaipur, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. Assistant Prosecution Officer, Civil Judge (JD), J.M. Court, Nawan, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 5. Durga Niwas S/o Sh. Akling Chaubisa Office Of Assistant Director, Prosecution, Udaipur Through Assistant Director, Prosecution. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC with Ms. Karishma Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 24/07/2025 The matter pertains to grant of promotion from the post of LDC-II to the Post of LDC-I. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition is rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been extended benefit claimed in the writ petition. None for the petitioner to rebut the aforesaid statement. [2025:RJ-JP:27840] (2 of 2) [CW-5500/2017] Taking into consideration the contention advanced by the learned counsel for the respondents, this civil writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for recalling of this order, if he feels that cause of action still subsists. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/282