IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.992 of 2025 Date of decision: 01.03.2025 Jaswant Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. : Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief(s):- “i). That the petitioner may be superannuated on attaining the age of 60 years i.e. July, 2015 by considering him to be in service w.e.f. July, 2013 to July, 2015. (її) That the petitioner may be granted the benefit of pension by counting the period rendered on work 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- charge status upto his superannuation for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits.” 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1st March, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)