IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATJ TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH \ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE- AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATl WRIT APPEAL NO: 22 OF 2020 ^ Writ Appeal under clause 1^of the Letters Patent of Writ Appeal the order dated 27-09-2019 in W.P.No.7784 of 2019 Court. Between: 1. The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. 2. Branch Manager Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, D.o.52- 14-77/1, Near L.B.College, New Resapuvanipalem Visakhapatnam. ...APPELLANTS - against on the file of the High AND Prakash Agarwal, S/o. Satyanarayana Agarwal, Aged 52 years, R/o. Fat No. 102, Radhika Royal, Ward o.l, Janwari Bhilai - 490020, Chattisgarh State ...RESPONDENT- lA NO: 2 OF 2020 -- Petition under Section ^5^ CPC stated in the affidavit filed in pleased to suspend the orders learned W.P.No.7784 of 2019. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI G. R. SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P. DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: JUDGMENT praying that in the circumstances support of the petition, the High Court may be J single Judge dated 27-09-2019 in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-11 [3483] APHC010384032019 WRIT APPEAL NO: 22 of 2020 The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, rep. by its Managing Director and another. ...Appellants Vs. Prakash Agarwal ...Respondent ********** Advocate for appellants Advocate for respondent Sri G. R. Sudhakar Sri P. Durga Prasad CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 18th March 2025 P C : The petitioner/respondent herein purchased a parcel of land admeasuring Ac.0-79 cents situate in Sy.Nos.125/8, 126/58, 126/59, 126/60, of Asakapalli Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in an auction conducted by the appellants on 18.01.2005. Having failed to convince the appellants - A. P. State Financial Corporation Limited to execute a sale deed in his favour based upon the said auction, the petitioner preferred W.P.No.7784 of 2019, which was allowed by virtue of the judgment and order impugned, and a direction issued to the appellants to execute the registered sale deed in respect of the land in question in favour of the petitioner. 126/61 and 126/62 2 The direction came to be issued also based upon the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant Corporation, who did not dispute the factum of the petitioner having purchased the parcel of land in the auction and also made a statement that the appellant Corporation was ready and willing to execute the registered sale deed in respect of the petitioner. 2. 3. Be that as it may, having conceded before the learned single Judge that the Corporation was willing to execute the registered sale deed in favour of the petitioner, the present appeal is, in those circumstances, not maintainable in view of the ratio of the judgment of the Apex Court in S. Thilagavathy vs. State of Tamilnadu and others\ Even otherwise we do not see any reason for the reluctance of the appellants to execute a proper sale deed having received the entire amount, which was the value of the land determined. through the process of auction as early as in the year 2005. 4. Be that as it may, we do not find any merit in the present appeal, which is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ^ (2011) 6 Supreme Court Cases 365 Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI^" OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri G. R. Sudhakar, Advocate [OPUC] — 2. One CC to Sri P. Durga Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] • 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED: 18/03/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.22 of 2020 ^ 2 3 MAR ?n?5 n Current oecuon . DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS