Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27091 (RAJ)

PRIYANKA GOSWAMI D/O SHRI SURENDRA GOSWAMI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13376/2024 · 2025-02-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8155] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13376/2024 Priyanka Goswami D/o Shri Surendra Goswami, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of 12/103, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jyoti Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 Through Its Secretary ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG with Mr. Aditya sharma, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/02/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for RSSB has relied upon S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13561/2024 tilted as Surendra Choudhary and Ors. Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board and Ors. and has submitted that the matter is no more res- integra as the same is already adjudicated by the relied upon judgment wherein, the effect of answer key, opinion given by the experts after due consideration, is upheld by the Co-ordinate Bench of Principal Seat, Jodhpur. [2025:RJ-JP:8155] (2 of 2) [CW-13376/2024] 2. It is submitted that qua the lis in hand, a number of the petitioners have approached this Court, wherein considering the judgment encapsulated in Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board registered as SBCWP No.14401/2021, directions were given for considering the representation and passing appropriate orders, within a period of 10 days. Lastly, it is submitted that inspite of the categorical directions by the Court, respondents have not considered the claim of the petitioner(s). 3. Learned counsel for respondents have undertaken to do the needful within a period of fortnight from the date of passing of this order and communicate the decision to the petitioner, pronto. 4. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /149