924.APEAL.398.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 398 OF 2025 The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant Versus Dashrath Prabhakar More And Another ...Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2025 WITH APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY STATE NO. 82 OF 2025 *** Mr. V. K. Kotecha, APP for the Appellant. Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. P. V. Gole h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2025. *** CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1. At the outset, learned APP submits that he be permitted to state that the appeal against acquittal is filed under Section 14 (A) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. Shrikant Malani 924.APEAL.398.2025 4. This is an appeal against the acquittal preferred by the State. The appeal is against conviction preferred by the accused is already admitted. 5. In that view of the matter, “Admit.” 6. To be tagged along with Appeal No.33 of 2025. 7. In view of admission of appeal, the application for grant of permission to file leave to appeal does not survive and accordingly disposed of. ( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. ) Shrikant Malani