Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2708 (CHH)

SHIWNANDAN JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/266/2023 · 2025-02-03

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5990 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 266 of 2023 1 - Shiwnandan Jaiswal S/o Shri Manohar Lal Jaiswal Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.) Mathematics At Govt, High School, Bhadisar, Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, Education Division, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer, Sarangarh-Bilaigarh District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Amitabh Sahu S/o Late Goverdhan Sahu Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.) Hindi At Govt. High School, Bhadisar, Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Sangeeta Kaushik, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.02.05 15:19:51 +0530 2 For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 03/02/2025 1. Heard Ms. Sangeeta Kaushik, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Choubey, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that since the grievances raised by the petitioner has already been redressed, as such, the petitioner don't want to pursue this case. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, on the basis of instruction received from the petitioner and submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this instant petition is disposed of rendering it to be infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi