IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 744 OF 2002 Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC., against the Judgment passed in A.S.No. 88 of 1999, Dt.27.2.2002 on De the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Darsi, dismissing the appeal and confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 197 of 1992 Dt.20.9.1999 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Darsi. Between; Puppala Maheswara Rao, S/o. Rudraiah, Age: 47, Occ; Agriculturist, R/o; Bapatia, Guntur District. .„APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT AND 1. Chennamsetti Venkateswarlu, S/o. Ramaiah, Age: 39 years, Occ: Agriculturist 2. Chennamsetti Punnaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged: 32 years, Occ: Agriculturist Both R/o. Darsi, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF Counsel for the Appellant : SRI V HARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondents : SMT NIMMAGADDA REVATHI The Court made the following JUDGMENT : APHC010383452002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SfflB WM [3369] THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 744/2002 Between: Puppala Maheswara Rao. ...APPELLANT AND Ch Venkateswarlu Anothr ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.VHARI HARAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.02.2002, passed in A.S.No.88 of 1999, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Darsi. 2. None appeared on both sides. On 03.01.2025, this Court directed the learned counsel for the appellant to get ready for disposal of the matter. Despite direction and despite listing the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ none appeared on both sides, today. 3. { 4. It seems that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, this Court has no other alternative except to dismiss the appeal. 5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Darsi, Prakasam District. One CC to Sri V Hah Haran Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Nimmagadda Revathi Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. SAM TAC HIGH COURT DATED:30/01/2025 JUDGMENT 5^ SA.No.744 of 2002 X 2 5 FEB 2C25 ^ Current Section DISMISSING THIS SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT