LEELA CHOYAL D/O BHANWAR LAL v. RAJASTHAN STAFF SELECTION BOARD
WMAP/343/2025 · 2025-08-11
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31155] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 343/2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1409/2025
1. Leela Choyal D/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bera Kudiya, Jetawas Road, Bilara District Jodhpur (Raj.)
2. Anup Prakash S/o Shri Ramlal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Uppwe Bhaktiyana, Pauri Road, Near Gb Pant Office, Srinagar Garhwal, District Pauri Garhwal, Uttrakhand
3. Udaram S/o Lekhram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)
4. Hanumanana Ram S/o Shri Panna Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rampura Purava, Tehsil Dhorimanna, District Barmer (Raj.)
5. Manoj Dadhich S/o Shri Harish Chandra Dadhich, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Swami Mohalla, Naya Sahar, District Bikaner (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chain Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tilak Vaid for Mr. Yavraj Samant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 11/08/2025
1. Heard counsel for the parties on the misc. application to recall/review the final order dated 03.07.2025, passed in respect of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1409/2025.
2. It appears that vide order dated 03.07.2025, bunch of writ petitions involving the issue of challenging the answers of five questions, asked in the competitive examination of the Informatics
[2025:RJ-JP:31155] (2 of 2) [WMAP-343/2025] Assistant, 2023, were decided. In the writ petition No. 1409/2025, the issue does not relate to the correctness of five questions but the issue involved in the said writ petition is of seeking exemption from the phase 2 i.e. Typing Test Examination, since the petitioners are disabled candidates and unable to appear for the said typing test, such issue was not considered in the order dated 03.07.2025, however, since the writ petition was tagged along with the bunch and same has also been disposed of.
3. In view of the above, with the consent of counsel for the respondents, the order dated 03.07.2025, to the extent of disposing of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1409/2025, is recalled.
4. The writ petition is restored to its original number, which would be heard and decided on its own merits.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/96