1 2025:CGHC:7520 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5489 of 2019 Nand Kishore Shukla S/o Shri Baldev Prashad Shukla Aged About 64 Years R/o Village - Barikhera, Post - Goyara, Police Station - Goyara, Tahsil - Gourihar, District Chatarpur (Madhya Pradesh). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Director Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indiravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat, Jhagrakhand, District Korea Chhattisgarh. 5 - Director Treasury, Account And Pension Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Accountant General State Of Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lav Sharma, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 3 & 5/State : Mr. Santosh Soni, Govt. Advocate and Mr.Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Shikhar Shukla, Advocate For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Tanmay Thomas, Advocate on behalf of Mr. RK Gupta, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 12.02.2025 1. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records leading to pertaining to the present case. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.02.13 10:25:57 +0530 2 10.2 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct Respondent authority to release (pay) the pension & all other retiral dues to the petitioner with 18% interest. 10.3 Any other relief may also be granted to the Petitioner which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondent authorities have calculated pension as well as retiral dues of the petitioner and communication has been made in this regard, therefore, as of now, he does not want to prosecute present petition. Hence, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition, if occasion arises. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer. 4. In view fo the aforesaid contention made by learned counsel for the petitioner, he is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition, if occasion arises. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini