\ . APHC010382632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19669 OF 2025 Between: 1. Kandregula Sanjeev Kumar, S/o. Late Rama Rao, aged about years,R/o D. No. 50-117-17/1, Seethamadhara, Visakhapatnam. 2. Mallakrishna Kishore,, S/o. Ram Naidu, aged about 52 years, R/o D. / No. 16-2-30, KothaVedi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam. 54 ...Petitioners AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagupudi, District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam. 6. The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 7. The District Registrar, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 8. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, represented by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. Amaravati, Guntur Department 9. Urukuti Babu Rao, S/o Late Appala Swamy, aged about not known to the petitioners, but major, resident of Nethaji Street, Chinna Gadhili Village, Visakhapatnam. Urukuti Shankar Rao, S/o Late Appala Swamy, aged about not known to the petitioners, but major, resident of Nethaji Street, ChinnaGadhili Village, Visakhapatnam. Urukuti Nagendra, S/o Shankar Rao, aged about not known to the petitioners, but major, resident of Nethaji Street, ChinnaGadhili <4 10. 11. Village, Visakhapatnam. Urukuti Venkata Ramana, S/o Late Appala Swamy, aged about Village, 12. ChinnaGadhili 58 years, resident of Nethaji Street Visakhapatnam. Urukuti Rama Krishna, S/o Late Appala Swamy, aged about 54 Village, 13. ChinnaGadhili of Nethaji Street years, resident Visakhapatnam. Rayudu Sridevi, W/o Rayudu Satyanarayana, aged about 39 years, resident of D. No. 11-15-12, Atchutaramaiah Street, Rama Rao Peta, Kakinada, East Godavari District. Pilli Jayasri, W/o Pilli Satti Babu, aged about 37 years, resident of D. No. 45-57-10/1/1, Saligrampuram Village, Narasimh Nagar, 14. 15. Visakhapatnam. Mamidisetti Shanthi Sri, W/o M.V. Visweswara Rao, aged about PTS, NTPC, 16. 36 years, resident of D. No. A-8/21, Jyothi Nagar, Ramagundam. X Sri Chennuboina Srinivasa Rao, S/o Late Kondaiah, aged about 50 years, currently MLA of Visakhapatnann. South Constituency, R/o Dondaparti, Netaji Nagar, Moin Road, V-i€akhapatnam. 17. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, or a direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 7 not to entertain any registration or alienations in respect of the properties of the petitioners to an extent of 580.8 Sq. Yds. and another extent of 484 Sq. Yds. respectively in Sy. No. 13/3B Mandal situated in Chinnagadhili Village of Visakhapatnam Rural when the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 or any other persons on their behalf submit documents for registration pending disposal of the protest Respondent No.4, and the Respondent No.8 the petition by the not to issue building permissions or Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) in respect of the said properties of the petitioners when applied by the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 or any other persons on their behalf pending disposal of the protest petition by the Respondent No.4 to pass such other order or orders and as thit Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated m the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 7 not to entertain any registration or alienations in respect of the properties of the petitioners i.e., an extent of 580.8 Sq. Yds. and another extent of 484 Sq. Yds. in Sy. No. 13/3B respectively situated in Chinnagadhili Village of Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal when the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 persons on their behalf submit the documents or any other for registration pending disposal of the protest petition by the Respondent No.4, and the Respondent No.8 not to issue building permissions or Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) in respect of the said properties of the petitioners when applied by the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 or any other persons on their behalf pending disposal of the the Respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above writ petition protest petition by f •/ Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9 to 17: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: t y' APHC010382632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) mi [3331] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19669/2025 Between: 1.KANDREGULA SANJEEV KUMAR, S/0. LATE RAMA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS,R/0 D. NO. 50-117-17/1, SEETHAMADHARA, ABOUT VI^AKHAPATNAM. 2.MALLAKRISHNA KISHORE,, S/0. RAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 R/0 D. NO. 16-2-30, KOTHAVEDI, ANAKAPALLI, YEARS VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGUPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PRINCIPAL 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, PRINCIPAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. URUKUTI BABU RAO, S/0 LATE APPALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, BUT MAJOR, RESIDENT OF NETHAJI STREET, CHINNA GADHILI VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 10. URUKUTI SHANKAR RAO, S/0 LATE APPALA NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, BUT MAJOR RESIDENT OF NETHAJI VISAKHAPATNAM. CORPORATION, ITS COMMISSIONER, SWAMY, AGED ABOUT STREET, CHINNAGADHILI VILLAGE 11. URUKUTI NAGENDRA, S/0 SHANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, BUT MAJOR, RESIDENT OF NETHAJI STREET, CHINNAGADHILI VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM 12. URUKUTI VENKATA RAMANA, S/0 LATE APPALA SWAMY YEARS, RESIDENT AGED OF NETHAJI STREET, ABOUT 58 CHINNAGADHILI VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 13. URUKUTI RAMA KRISHNA, S/0 LATE APPALA ABOUT 54 YEARS CHINNAGADHILI VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 14.RAYUDU SRIDEVI ABOUT ATCHUTARAMAIAH STREET, RAMA RAO PETA, KAKINADA GODAVARI DISTRICT. SWAMY, AGED NETHAJI STREET, RESIDENT OF W/0 RAYUDU SATYANARAYANA 39 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D. AGED NO. 11-15-12, EAST 15.PILLI JAYASRI, W/0 PILLI SATTI BABU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D. NO. 45-57-10/1/1, SALIGRAMPURAM VILLAGE NARASIMH NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 16.MAMIDISETTI SHANTHI SRI, W/0 M.V. VISWESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D. NO. A-8/21, JYOTHI NAGAR PTS, NTPC, RAMAGUNDAM. 17.SRI CHENNUBOINA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE KONDAIAH ABOUT 50 YEARS, CURRENTLY MLA OF AGED VISAKHAPATNAM 3 SOUTH CONSTITUENCY, R/0 DONDAPARTI, NETAJI NAGAR, MOIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, or a direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 7 not to entertain any registration or alienations in respect of the properties of the petitionersto an extent of 580.8 Sq. Yds. and another extent of 484 Sq.Yds. Respectively in Sy. No. 13/3B, situated in Chinnagadhili Village of Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal when the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No.17 or any other persons on their behalf submit the documents for registration pending disposal of the protest petition by the Respondent No.4, and the Respondent No.8 not to issue building permissions or Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) in respect of the said properties of the petitioners when applied by the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 or any other persons on their behalf pending disposal of the protest petition by the Respondent No.4, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case, and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 7 not to entertain any registration or alienations in respect of the properties of the petitioners i.e., an extent of 580.8 Sq. Yds. and another extent of 484 Sq. Yds. in Sy. No. 13/3B respectively situated in Chinnagadhili Village of Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal when the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 or any other persons on their behalf submit the documents for registration pending disposal of the protest petition by the Respondent No.4, and the Respondent No.8 not to issue building permissions or Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) in respect of the said properties of the petitioners when applied by the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 9 to 13 or Unofficial Respondent No. 17 or any other persons on their behalf pending disposal of the protest petition by the Respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Heard Sn Syed Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri B.V.Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1, 3 to 7, learned Assistant Government Administration and Urban Development A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing counsel for the 8'^ respondent. 2. The notice in respect of the respondents 9 no adverse order is passed affecting the right to 17. Pleader for Municipal respondent and Sri nd for the 2 to 17 is dispensed with since or interest of the respondents 9 3. The above writ petition has been filed entertain any registration in respect of land admeasuring 580.8 Sq yards and 484 Sq.yards in Sy.No.13/3B, Chinnagadhili Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal. to direct the 7'^ respondent not to 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would purchased the aforementioned submit that the petitioners property under a registered sale deed from respondents 9 to 13. The respondents, 9 to 13, fraudulently got their names mutated in the revenue records and were trying to alienate the property. The respondent on 06.01.2025 (Ex.P4). respondents 9 to 13 and 17 are making efforts to petitioners filed a revision before the Pending the revision, the alienate the property. 5. At the hearing, learned arguments and urged to direct the 4‘^ counsel for the petitioners confined his respondent to dispose of the revision .dated 06.01.2025 (Ex.P4), filed by the petitioners under Section 9 of the Afidhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. The writ petition was listed on 31.07.2025, and adjourned to today at the request of the learned Assistant Government Pleader to get instructions regarding the pendency of the revision. 6. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions of the respondent, would submit that no revision is pending on the file of the 4*'^ respondent. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would also submit that the revision dated 06.01.2025 (Ex.P4) does not contain the seal. He would further submit that if the petitioners filed a revision, the 4*^ respondent will entertain and pass appropriate orders. 7. 8. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners will file a fresh revision under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. Given the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage, with the consent of both the learned counsel, giving liberty to the petitioners to file a revision under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, before the 4 respondent. If the petitioners file a revision, the learned 4^*^ respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders strictly as per the law. No order as to costs. 9. th As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K.KASI RAO ACHAR! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OPFICFJR To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagupudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Principal Development Guntur District. Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, 3. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam. 6. The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, District. Visakhapatnam 7. The District Registrar, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 8. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, represented by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. 9. One CC to Sri. Kaleemulla S, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 10. [OUT] 11. Two CCs to GP For Registration And Stamps, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CCs to GP for MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]. One CC to Sri A S C Bose, Advocate [OPUC]. Two CD Copies. 12. 13. 14. AL HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 19669 OF 2025 a 2 3 SEP irentSec^ ieki^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS