Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27072 (RAJ)

GANPAT RAM JAT S/O LATE SHRI BHOLU RAM JAT v. SHRI SUDHIR RAJPAL

CCP/842/2023 · 2025-09-04

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35636] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 842/2023 Ganpat Ram Jat S/o Late Shri Bholu Ram Jat, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Krishna Vihar Colony, Renwal Road, Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Sudhir Rajpal, Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Nishkam Diwakar, Ceo, Zila Parishad, Jaipur. 3. Shri Yashwant Sharma, Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Govindgarh, Jaipur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayatiraj, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshad Kapoor For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/09/2025 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 02.01.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4284/2014. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have already complied with the order of the Court and revised PPO and GPO have been issued. In view of the fact that revised PPO and GPO have been issued, the Court is of the opinion that the respondents have [2025:RJ-JP:35636] (2 of 2) [CCP-842/2023] complied with the order of the Court. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of. However, in case the petitioner, if has any grievance as regards the revised PPO and GPO, he would be at liberty to raise the grievance before the appropriate forum. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/75