2025:UHC:2035-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB No. 53 of 2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. There is no representation for the respondents. 3. This writ petition was filed in 2017, challenging advertisement dated 15.10.2016, issued by Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Bharsar, Pauri Garhwal. By the said advertisement, applications were invited for appointment to various teaching positions. 4. Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no selection was held pursuant to the impugned advertisement and no regular appointment has also been made pursuant to the advertisement in question, therefore, the reliefs, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 21.03.2025 Navin