Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2707 (GAU)

M/s R B Enterprises and Anr v. The State of AP and 5 Ors

WP(C)/597/2025 · 2026-02-15

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040020872025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/597/2025 M/s R B Enterprises and Anr having its registered office at Jayang Bagang Village, PO and PS Chayang Tajo, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh, represented by its proprietor Shri Rungni Bagang. 2: Rungni Bagang Age: Occupation : Son of Late Taku Bagang a permanent resident of Jayang Bagang Village Po and PS Chayang Tajo East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Director (RE) Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Development Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Joint Director (RE) Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Development Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Deputy Director (RD) Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 Rural Development Department Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Tender Scrutiny Board Age: 0 Occupation : through its Chairman cum ADC Seppa (HQ) East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s Kame Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri kame Yangfo Son of Late Sama Yangfo Yangfo Village PO and PS Chayang Tajo East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh 79010 Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara, Y Mugli,Pondit Ronya,Taba Tokur,Khoda Apa,Gamken Bam Advocate for the Respondent : Binter Picha, M Basar,Khyoda Yayo,Kipa Tagar,Michi Khambo,R Taku,Binny Nyaruce,Rajesh Sonar,SC (RD) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 16.02.2026 Mr. P. Ronya, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the writ petition. Mr. M. Khambo, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and Mr. B. Picha, learned Standing counsel for the RD are present. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal, with a liberty to file afresh, if so advised. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant