IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 1057 of 2025 Decided on 29th May, 2025 Amar Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Mohar Chand Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 7. Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this writ petition was taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 6 submits that said respondents have been wrongly impleaded as a party respondent as the transmission line has been laid down by POWERGRID Himachal Transmission Limited which is a subsidiary company of POWERGRID. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the backdrop of the reply filed by respondents No.2 to 6, the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this writ petition but with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same facts by impleading the correct respondents therein. 2 3. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 29, 2025 (Vinod)