1 2025:CGHC:31586 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 894 of 2025 1 - Hariram Verma S/o Bharosa Verma Aged About 70 Years Caste- Verma, R/o Village- Jaroud, P.S.- Bhatapara (Rural), District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Bharat Lal Verma S/o Bharosa Verma Aged About 68 Years Caste- Verma, R/o Village- Jaroud, P.S. - Bhatapara (Rural), District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Shankar Lal Verma S/o Bharosa Verma Aged About 65 Years Caste- Verma, R/o Village- Jaroud, P.S. - Bhatapara (Rural), District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicants versus 1 - Shri Manoj Kumar Pingua Working As Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home (Jail), Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 492002 2 - Shri Himanshu Gupta Working As Chhattisgarh Director General, Jail And Reforms Services, Jail Headquarter, Sector- 19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Shri Amit Shandilya Working As Superintendent Of Jail, Central Jail, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Applicants : Ms. Devanshi Chakraborty, Advocate For Respondent No.1 For Respondents No.2 & 3 : : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Advocate Mr. Umakant Singh Chandel , Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 09/07/2025 1. Heard. 2. This contempt petition has been preferred by applicants under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of 2 Courts Act, 1971 for non-compliance of the order dated 24.01.2025 (Annexure-A/1) passed in WPCR No.41/2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the order under contempt dated 24.01.2025 (Annexure-A/1) passed by learned Division Bench in WPCR No.41/2025 has been complied with by the respondent authorities. She further submits that since the order under contempt has been complied with, therefore, nothing remains in this petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents also conceded the aforesaid contention of learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Having considered the contentions of learned counsel for both the parties, since the order under contempt has been complied with, therefore, nothing remains in this contempt petition, hence, the same is disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.07.10 10:28:38 +0530