Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27062 (PNJ)

UDAY SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/9269/2025 · 2025-04-08

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9269-2025 Date of Decision:08.04.2025 Uday Sharma …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Prabhjot Singh Waraich, Advocate with Dr. Khushbir K.Waraich, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.45, dated 14.06.2024, under Sections 323,324,341,506,34 of IPC,326 of IPC added later on, registered at Police Station Ghanaur, District Patiala (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 18.02.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 18.02.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under HITESH 2025.04.08 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-9269-2025 -2 Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S.. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.04.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.04.08 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh