Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Satyapal
State of Haryana and others
CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Akshit Mehta, Advocate for Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate,
for the
Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
LAPITA BANERJI CM-4207-CWP
This is an application for withdrawal of the main writ petition.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
Main case Main case
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not willing to proceed with the writ petition any longer as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
Accordingly, CWP
Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed of.
March 24, 202 Vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.103+212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM CWP Date of Decision :
… Versus State of Haryana and others
…Respondent HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Akshit Mehta, Advocate for Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.
*** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral)
CWP-2025 This is an application for withdrawal of the main writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is Main case is taken up for consideration.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not willing to proceed with the writ petition any longer as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, CWP-4578-2024 is Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed (LAPITA BANERJI)
JUDGE
2025 ther speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-4207-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-4578-2024 Date of Decision : 24.03.2025
…Applicant-petitioner …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. This is an application for withdrawal of the main writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. is taken up for consideration.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not willing to proceed with the writ petition any longer as the grievance of the is dismissed as infructuous. Connected applications, if any, are also accordingly disposed (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
VANDANA 2025.03.24 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document