PRABHU v. THE STATE REP BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CRL OP/4565/2025 · 2025-03-06
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27059 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27059 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.4565 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 4565 of 2025 PRABHU Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police, AWPS-Rasipuram, Namakkal District. Cr.No.10/2020. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Harirajan For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side). ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.10.2020 seeking bail in Crime No.10 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 5(l), 5(m) read with 6 of POCSO Act Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4565 of 2025
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the certain other accused committed penetrative sexual assault on two victims, aged about 12 and 13 years respectively. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the allegations are false and improbable; that 12 other accused are said to have committed the sexual assault by paying money to the minor child and that the petitioner is in custody from 12.10.2020 and continuous incarceration is against the fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instructions submitted that the case was split up in Spl.C.C. No.12 of 2021 and separate trial was conducted against the other accused; that the prosecution had closed its evidence in the year 2022, that the petitioner has been delaying the proceedings by filing one petition after the other and hence sought for dismissal. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4565 of 2025
5. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, on reading of the evidence of the witnesses would show that the petitioner is innocent. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail petition at this stage. However, since the petitioner is in custody and the case is at the defence stage, the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Namakkal is directed to conclude the trial in Spl.C.C. No.12 of 2021 as expeditiously as possible. 7. With the above observations, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
06.03.2025 rkp Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4565 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. rkp Copy to: 1.The Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station, Rasipuram, Namakkal District 2.The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Namakkal. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRL OP NO. 4565 of 2025 06.03.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis