Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010279892025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4063/2025 TSIRILA SANGTAM W/O TOFIKUR RAHMAN, C/O MAJANI BEGUM, R/O JYOTI NAGAR, KAILASHPUR, NEAR KAILASHPUR LP SCHOOL, PS NOONMATI, DIST KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PO NOONMATI, PIN 781020, PERMANENT ADDRESS D/O TSAOPI,H NO 164, JAIL WARD, NEAR SDMO OFFICE, KIPHIRE TOWN, P.S. KIPHIRE NAGALAND- 798611 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, MR. D K AGARWALA,MS AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, A MISHRA (INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 17-12-2025 Heard Mr. T.A Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. K.K Parasar, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State and Mr. A. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the informant who appeared on advance notice. Page No.# 2/3 This application has been filed under section 483 of BNSS praying for granting bail to the accused petitioner in connection with Noonmati P.S Case No. 229/2025 u/s 305(b)/112(2) of BNS Act, 2023. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR had been lodged regarding the same vehicle and although the husband of the petitioner is a sale agent, the present petitioner is not in any manner link to any transaction which occurred between the husband of the petitioner and the informant. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although there was a transaction of money between the husband of the petitioner and the informant, the money was deposited in the account of the petitioner and given an opportunity, they are ready to refund the money received and further participate in the investigation. It is the case of the petitioner that the owner of the vehicle had committed some fraudulent activity due to which the present petitioner and her husband has been taken into custody and FIR has been lodged by the informant. The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that they had intended to file a joint FIR against the original owner of the vehicle but the same could not proceed because the present petitioner and her husband had been taken into custody. The learned Addl. P.P has submitted that the forwarding report does not reveal any act on the part of the present petitioner per se. We have gone through the documents annexed with the bail petition. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this bail petition is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner namely, Tsirila Sangtam shall be released on bail in connection with the aforementioned case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety to the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Kamrup (M), Guwahati. It is made clear that the present applicant has been granted the privilege of bail on the assurance that she would participate in the investigation proceedings and because the informant does not raise any claim of fraudulent activities against the Page No.# 3/3 present petitioner. The petitioner shall be released subject to the following conditions that the petitioner; i) shall co-operate the remaining investigation ii) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence iii) shall not harass or harm the informant and other witnesses. In case of violation of any bail conditions, the bail will be liable to be cancelled. This bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant