[2025:RJ-JP:31401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10100/2025 1. Lalchand @ Lal Singh @ Lal Badshah S/o Shri Ghasiram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khari Modi Ki Dhani, Tan Chi- rana, Police Station Gothda District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2. Rajesh Saini @ Rajesh Chirania S/o Shri Sitaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kharsaniya Kothi Tan Chirana, Police Station Gothda District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.34/2025 registered at Police Station Gothara, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 324(4), 308(2), 115(2) & 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. Investigation is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 324(4), 115(2), 126(2), 331(6), 331(7), 110 & 117(1) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:31401] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10100/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is omnibus allegations against the petitioners. Counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured are opined as dangerous to life. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Counsel further submits that co- accused Nirmal Singh has already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.06.2025. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that none of the injuries sustained to the injured are opined as dangerous to life; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; co- accused Nirmal Singh has been granted benefit of bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:31401] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10100/2025] 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners -(1) Lalchand @ Lal Singh @ Lal Badshah S/o Shri Ghasiram & (2) Rajesh Saini @ Rajesh Chirania S/o Shri Sitaram shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /245