1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2628 of 2020 1 - M/s Greencon Construction Solution Through Prop Ravikant Agarwal S/o Surech Kumar Agrawal Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Limtara Ahiwara Road, Block Dhamdha District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - General Manager, District Trade And Industries Centre, Malviya Nager, Durg District Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Jha, Advocate For State : Mr.Vedant Shadangi, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 31.07.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s) : “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and direct the respondents to issue priority certificate to the petitioner. 10.2 That the respondents be directed to ascertain that the date of the priority certificate be the date of application of the petitioner. 10.3 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to make an order/orders, writ/writs or direction/ directions about to consider the case of the petitioner and set aside the order impugned to the extent of petitioner. They may also ensure that the industrial units be promoted in the state and the young enterprisers be encouraged. THE default of the respondents by Online method be. REKHA SINGH -2- 10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favor of the petitioner together with cost of the petition. 2. Mr. Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities within a period of 30 days and in turn, the authority concerned may be directed to decide it within a further period of 60 days in the light of the Industrial Policy of the State of Chhattisgarh. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the submissions made by Mr. Jha. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Jha, this petition at this juncture is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a fresh representation raising all his grievances before the respondent authority and in turn, the authority concerned is directed to decide it expeditiously preferably within a period of 60 days from today in the light of the Industrial Policy of the State of Chhattisgarh 6. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the present petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha