SALAPALA RAMACHANDRA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/19654/2025 · 2025-09-14
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27049 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27049 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010383402025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 19654/2025 BETWEEN:
1. SALAPALA RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/o. SALAPALA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-81, NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, ANANTAPUR RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DIST.
2. . SALAPALA JANARDHAN REDDY,, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-81, NARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, ANANTAPUR RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DIST.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, ANANTAPUR RURAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR.
5. U PAVAN KUMAR REDDY, S/O U.BALAKONDA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, R/O D.NO.6/2/985/7, NEAR OLD RTO OFFICE, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
2 Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent issuing a notice vide No.G/FR/1526/2025 dated 11-07-2025 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to O.S.No.6 of 2020 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge Anantapur and liable to set aside and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY
3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
On instructions of the Writ Petitioners, learned counsel for the Writ Petitioners has addressed a letter to the Registry to list the matter under the caption “for withdrawal”, as the Writ Petitioners do not want to proceed further with the case.
There is no representation for the Writ Petitioner.
In view of the letter addressed to the Registry (as part of record), permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.09.2025 Harin
4
122 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 19654 OF 2025
Date: 15-09-2025
Harin