PETER TIGGA v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHAIRPERSONSHIP, MISSION VATSALYA
WPC/980/2025 · 2025-06-24
Rajesh Shankar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27043 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27043 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:16655-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 980 of 2025
1. Peter Tigga
2. Prabhakar Jha
3. Ranjit Kumar Mahato
4. Sarita Kumar
5. Ranjana Jha
6. Ramjivan Das
7. Shiv Sagar Das
8. Rajesh Kumar
9. Nand Kishor Mahato
10. Hublal Das
11. Azmat Fatima
12. Rekha Kumari
13. Vivek Kumar
14. Sita Kumari
15. Md. Mofiz Ansari
16. Aman Kumar
17. Rakesh Kumar Mishra @ Rakesh Misra
18. Urmila Mardi
19. Yudhishteer Paul @ Yadhishteer Paul
20. Sita Mardi
21. Mithun Mahato
22. Guddi Singh
23. Shekhar Prasad
24. Brajesh Yadav
25. Soni Kumari @ Soni Kumare
26. Rajesh Kumar Murmu
27. Bindeshwar Paswan
28. Hiran Nayak
29. Kaleshwar Oraon
30. Ananius Kiro @ Anunius Kiro
31. Arpan Ekka
32. Deepak Kindo
33. Alma Bela Toppo
34. Suman Teresa Lakra
35. Michael Ekka
36. Jagdish Sharma
37. Ranjit Kumar Choubey
38. Guleshwar Kumar
39. Meghnath Mahto
40. Punam Kumari
41. Maya Mishra
42. Upasana Verma @ Upashna Verma
43. Mukesh Mondal
44. Milan Bauri
45. Premlata Kisku
46. Subhash Hansda
47. Shashikant Singh
48. Anil Murmu
49. Sushil Soy
2025:JHHC:16655-DB 2
50. Loknath Bhandari
51. Dinenath Bhandari @ Dinanath Bhandari
52. Shakichand Kumar
53. Ramsahay Tuti
54. Basanti Mundu @ Bansanti Mundu
55. Achi Tuti
56. Saniyo Kongari
57. Junul Hemrom
58. Sunita Kumari
59. Lavkesh Kumar
60. Kumari Jyoti Sinha
61. Sachidanand Lakra
62. Shashi Kala Kujur
63. Nilam Kumari
64. Amit Singh
65. Wilson Tigga
66. Aditya Xalxo
67. Harendra Kumar @ Harendera Kumar
68. Hanuk Kachhap
69. Pankaj Kumar Yadav
70. Arti Kumari
71. Seema Biswas
72. Rishidev Mandal
73. Srinath Bandari @ Srinath Bhansari
74. Rajen Saha
75. Putul Kumari
76. Rajdeo Prasad Verma
77. Sandeep Kumar
78. Pradeep Kumar
79. Anuj Kumar
80. Raju Kumar
81. Bindu Devi
82. Pushpa Kumari
83. Vinita Kumari
84. Ravindra Goswami
85. Ravi Kumar
86. Umesh Kumar
87. Kamlesh Kumar
88. Puja Kumari
89. Mallika Dutta @ Malika Dutta
90. Prakash Mahto
91. Dilip Kumar
92. Tirthnath Mahto
93. Rahul Kumar Balmiki
94. Neha Kumari
95. Ranjit Toppo
96. Anwarul Haque
97. Neelima Kujur
98. Kiran Baxla
99. Puja Kumari
100. Binita Toppo
2025:JHHC:16655-DB 3
101. Divya Toppo
102. Archana Aind
103. Sushma Toppo
104. Manoj Sameer Toppo
105. Jyoti Toppo
106. Reshma Binha
107. Ravi Raj Tigga
108. Reshmi Kerketta
109. Manish Kumar Paswan
110. Bikash Kumar Daroga
111.
Ram Chandra Singh Munda
112. Romani Hansda
113. Laxmi Murmu
114. Ajit Kabi
115. Brihaspati Mahato
116. Basanta Mahato
117. Sakhi Baraik
118. Manoj Kullu
119. Praful Kiro
120. Nitren Lugun
121. Ranjit Dung Dung
122. Pradeep Paul Ekka
123. Pradeep Kullu
124. Manita Bara
125. Anant Pradhan
126. Pankajini Devi
127. Pooja Nayak
128. Karmu Bodra
129. Manjula Pradhan
130. Om Karwa
131. Janaklata Gope
… … Petitioners
Versus
1. The Union of India, through its Chairpersonship, Mission Vatsalya Project Approval Board (PAB), P.O. & P.S.-Shashtri Bhavan, New Delhi
2. The State of Jharkhand, through Secretary, Department of Women Child Development & Social Security, Ranchi
3. The Chairman, Jharkhand State Child Protection Society, Ranchi
4. The Director, Jharkhand State Child Protection Society, Ranchi
5. Deputy Secretary, Jharkhand State Child Protection Society, Ranchi
6. M/s Balaji Detective Force Man Power Provider, through its Director, Ranchi
… … Respondents
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Petitioners: Mr. Anup Kr. Agrawal, Advocate For the Res.-U.O.I.: Mr. Anil Kumar, A.S.G.I.
Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, C.G.C.
-----
2025:JHHC:16655-DB 4
03/24.06.2025
1. Since the petitioners are challenging in this writ petition the Standard Operating Procedures (SoP) of Mission Vatsalya Scheme notified on 31.03.2023 by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India for the purpose of 24x7 Child Helpline ‘1098’ service for children as defined under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (as amended in 2021), and since the petitioners are unable to show any right vested in them to be employed as per the said scheme, and on merely harping on the fact that previously they were engaged in the said scheme, we are not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners. 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J)
Satish/Vikas/-
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)