ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMTI ANJU PRADHA AND 3 ORS.
I.A.(Civil)/3691/2025 · 2025-12-07
Yarenjungla Longkumer
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27043 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27043 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010245862025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3691/2025 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT ICICI BANK TOWERS, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, MUMBAI 400051, ITS ZONAL OFFICE AT APEEJAY HOUSE, 15 PARK STREET, 7TH FLOOR, KOLKATA700016, AND A BRANCH OFFICE AT KAMAKHYA TOWER 3RD FLOOR, OFFICE NO. 305 AND 306, G.S ROAD, GUWAHATI-781005, ASSAM. VERSUS SMTI ANJU PRADHA AND 3 ORS.
W/O LATE PRAKASH PRADHAN 2:SRI ANKIT PRADHAN S/O LATE PRAKASH PRADHAN 3:MISS AKSHITA PRADHAN D/O LATE PRAKASH PRADHAN
RESIDENTS OF- MISSION PARA NEAR VIVEKANANDA VIDYALAYA SCHOOL P.O AND P.S-DIGBOI DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3 BEING MINORS ARE REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 MOTHER 4:SRI PARTHA PRATIM BORAH S/O SRI DHARMA KANTA BORAH R/O 1 NO.CHAPATOLI P.O-BHADOI PACHALI P.S.-DULIAJAN
Page No.# 2/2 DIST-DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- OWNER CUM RIDER OF THE VEHICLE NO.AS-06-X-0739 ROYAL ENFILED THUNDERBIR Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M SAIKIA, MS. P BORTHAKUR,MR. R GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 08.12.2025
Heard Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the applicant. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed by the applicant praying for condonation of delay of 11 days in preferring the connected appeal which has been preferred against a Judgment and Award dated 04.03.2025 passed by the learned Additional Member, Member, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal no. 1, Margherita, Tinsukia in MAC Case no. 05/2020. I have considered the averments and statements made in the interlocutory application. The reasons for delay cited by the applicant which have occurred in preferring the connected appeal being satisfactory, the period of delay of 11 days is condoned. The interlocutory application stands allowed. The Registry shall register the connected appeal and thereafter, to list the appeal for admission hearing in the next week. JUDGE Comparing Assistant