MOHAMMED GAUS SON OF SHRI RAFIQ MOHAMMED v. N.I.A.
CRLAD/234/2024 · 2025-01-20
Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27033 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27033 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2714-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 234/2024
1. Mohammed Gaus Son Of Shri Rafiq Mohammed, Aged About 39 Years, R/o House No. 24/729, Raja Nagar, Near Kishanpol Police Chowki, Police Station Surajpol Udaipur Rajasthan
2. Aasif Husain Son Of Shri Mohammed Husain, Aged About 23 Years, R/o House No. 245, Mohalla Mahawat Wadi, Near Mahawatwadi, Street Before Government School Girwa Udaipur Rajasthan And Street No. 4, Vijay Singh Pathik Nagar, Police Station Sabeena District Udaipur Rajasthan
3. Farhad Mohammed Son Of Shri Ejaj Mohammed, Aged About 31 Years, R/o House No. 143/24, Patel Circle, Deevan Shah Colony, Udaipur Rajasthan And Deevan Shah Colony, Patel Circle Girawa, Shastri Nagar, Udaipur Rajasthan ----Appellants Versus N.I.A, Through Its Special Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anshul Mathur, Adv. Mr. Vikas Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sneh Deep Khyaliya, Adv.with Mr. Manish Parmar, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 20/01/2025
1. Office has pointed out a defect that the present appeal is not maintainable as per Section 21(1) of National Investigation Agency Act as the order impugned is interlocutory order.
2. We have perused the order.
[2025:RJ-JP:2714-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLAD-234/2024]
3. As per the order, only documents have been taken on record and that cannot be said to be a final order. Therefore, the appeal is not maintainable and the same is accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J CHANDAN /155