Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27032 (KAR)

SRI R CHANNAPPA ALIAS CHINNAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16607/2024 · 2025-04-03

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14246 WP No. 16607 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 16607 OF 2024 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI R CHANNAPPA ALIAS CHINNAPPA SON OF LATE DODDA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 63./1, 2ND MAIN ROAD, MUTHYALANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 054. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.N.PRASANNA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA-561 203. 3. THE TAHASILDAR DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA-561 203. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DTD 04.12.2015 PASSED IN PROCEEDINGS NO. Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14246 WP No. 16607 of 2024 LRF.SR(D) NO. 285/12-13 BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA I.E R2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY DROP THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. An order of vesting passed by the Assistant Commissioner for contravention of Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 ("the Act", for short) is challenged in this petition. 2. The petitioner has produced a copy of the order sheet maintained by the Assistant Commissioner. The entire order sheet maintained basically indicates that the proceedings were being adjourned due to unavailability of the Presiding Officer and ultimately, the order was passed stating that Sections 79A and 79B of the Act were contravened which required an order of vesting to be passed. It is therefore clear - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14246 WP No. 16607 of 2024 that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. 3. Since the order of vesting would take away the rights of the ownership of land in question, the appropriate course would be to afford one more opportunity to the petitioner. 4. In the normal course, the matter would have to be remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, since Sections 79A and 79B of the Act were omitted by virtue of an amendment to the Land Reforms Act, no useful purpose would be served by remanding the matter to the Assistant Commissioner and hence, the impugned proceedings initiated shall stand abated. 5. In view of the above, the revenue authorities to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue record. 6. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:14246 WP No. 16607 of 2024 7. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1