APHC010382292011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25366/2011 Between: 1. P.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.SAMBASIVA RAO E.360670 CONDUCTOR, VIJAYAWADA DEPOT, R/O.D.NO.11/72 INDIAN BANK STREET, VUYYUR POST, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APSRTC, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHIRABAD, HYDERABAD 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC KRISHNA REGION, VIJAYAWADA 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC VIJAYAWADA DEPOT, VIJAYAWADA ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not showing the seniority of the petitioner in Krishna Division though the petitioner has opted for Krishna Division, and not relinquished his seniority as arbitrary, contrary to APSRTC Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964 discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein to reckon the seniority of the petitioner in Krishna Division from the date of initial appointment with all consequential benefits. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 31216 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant which is a zonal Post, pending disposal of the writ petition. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the default Order passed on 11.07.2022 in W.P.No.25366 of 2011 and restore the Writ petition to its original file and hear the case on merits in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M SOLOMON RAJU 2. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 25366 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:25366 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP