Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27027 (KAR)

D V UMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14839/2025 · 2025-06-05

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.14839 OF 2025 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN: 1. D.V.UMA W/O.N.J.RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.1, SHARE NO.9 2. NAGARATHNA W/O.UDAYAKUMAR MARUTHIPURA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.3, SHARE NO.49 3. ASHALATHA W/O.N.S.NANDISH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.4, SHARE NO.83 4. B.NIRMALA W/O.N.K.SUDHEER AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.5, SHARE NO.88 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 5. MUBEEN TAJ W/O.SANAULLA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.6, SHARE NO.186 6. SAVITHRI W/O.SHANKARANNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.8, SHARE NO.197 7. RAJAMMA W/O.PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.10, SHARE NO.204 8. VARALAKSHMI W/O.CHIKKATHIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.15, SHARE NO.233 9. MAHADEVAMMA W/O.RAMASETTY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.19, SHARE NO.251 10. NOORJAN W/O.ABDUL RASHEED - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.21, SHARE NO.258 11. LAKSHMAMMA W/O.RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.22, SHARE NO.265 12. SARASWATHI W/O.RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.23, SHARE NO.272 13. SHANTHAMMA W/O.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.26, SHARE NO.303 14. T.G.SUMITHRA W/O.N.S.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.29, SHARE NO.322 15. HASEENA B. W/O.BABU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.31, SHARE NO.326 16. RUKMINI W/O.N.T.SRIRANGARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.32, SHARE NO.330 17. CHIKKAMMA W/O.RANGANNA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.35, SHARE NO.341 18. B.MANJULA W/O.DIVAKARA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS MARUTHIPURA NAGAMANGALA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 SL.NO.36, SHARE NO.348 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.A.CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION M.S.BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 2. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3rd FLOOR, T.T.M.C. 'A' BLOCK, SHANTHI NAGAR BENGALURU-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 3. DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571 421 4. RETURNING OFFICER MARUTHIPURA MILK PRODUCERS MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. MARUTHIPURA KASABA HOBLI NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 5. MARUTHIPURA MILK PRODUCERS MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. MARUTHIPURA KASABA HOBLI NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI SIDDARTH B.MUCHANDI, ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THIS WRIT PETIITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE COSNTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 5 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO EXERCISE THEIR VOTES IN THE ELECTION TO BE HELD ON 22.05.2025 VIDE ANNEXRE-A TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RESPONDENT NO.5. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. This Court by way of various interim orders had permitted the petitioners who were declared to be ineligible voters to cast their vote in the elections of the Society, subject to the result of the writ petition and that the votes cast by the petitioners shall be kept in separate ballot boxes. 2. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of H.S.Raju vs. State of Karnataka & others1 has after considering the matter in detail come to a categorical conclusion that any irregularity in the conduct of election a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be the proper remedy any dispute as regards the eligibility or ineligibility and the deficiencies in finalization of final electoral list, could only be considered in a dispute raised as regard the election under Section 70(2) of the 1 W.P.No.8502/2022 dated 7.6.2022 - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 after the announcement of the results by counting even the votes cast by the petitioners. 3. The said judgment not having been challenged and having attained finality, the fact being more or less similar would equally apply to the present matter. 4. In that view of the matter, I pass the following: ORDER i) The Writ Petition is disposed of. ii) The Returning Officer in this matter is directed to announce the result within seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by taking into account the votes cast by the petitioners. iii) In the event of any proceeding being filed in relation to the results of the election under Section 70(2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, all the contentions raised herein and any that may be raised are left open - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19025 WP No. 14839 of 2025 for consideration in accordance with the applicable law, this Court has not expressed any opinion on those issues. iv) The votes cast by the respective petitioners which had been directed to be kept in separate box shall continue to be retained in a separate box until the disposal of the dispute if any raised within the time frame prescribed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74