MANISHA MALIK v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF TATA POWER NORTHERN ODISHA DISTRIBUTION LIMITED (TPNODL), BALASORE
WP(C)/32412/2025 · 2026-03-09
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2702 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2702 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C ) No.32412 of 2025
Manisha Malik
&. Petitioner Mr. A.N. Pattanaik, Adv.
-versus-
The Chief Executive Officer of Tata Power Northern Odisha Districtioin Limited (TPNODL), Balasore and Others
&. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA Ms. R.R. Jena, Adv. on behalf of Mr. L.K. Maharana, Adv.
COROM:
THE HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 09.03.2026
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- The Petitioner therefore prays that your Lordship may be pleased to consider the fact stated above and admit the Writ Application and after hearing the parties, the Opp. Parties may be kindly
directed to pay the Petitioner compensation with interest per annum within a stipulated period due to the negligence of the Opposite Parties in properly maintaining the electric wire in which the husband of the Petitioner lost his life. And for this act of kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.
5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner
to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of 3(three) weeks hence.
6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
sangita
Judge