IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 681 of 2024. Decided on : 9 th July, 2025. Dharam Pal Chauhan ...Petitioner. Versus Ram Singh Proprietor ....Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ravinder Singh Chandel, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). The matter has been amicably settled inter se the parties as a result of mediation. Accordingly, the petitioner does not press the instant petition. Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 9th July, 2025. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?