IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1164 of 2024 ---- Rajani Kanta Mahato aged about 43 years son of Atanka Bhanjan Mahato resident of village – Charinda (Khariyadih), P.O.-Charinda, P.S.-Galudih, Ditrict – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Shashi Prakash Singh, s/o not known to the petitioner, The Director, Primary Education, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, MDI Building, P.O.+P.S.- Dhurwa, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Sri. Ananya Mittal, s/o not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, P.O.+P.S.- Sakchi, District – East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. …. …. Opposite Party(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Yasir Arafat, A.C. to G.P.-IV ---- 04/Dated: 28th March, 2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present contempt petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for initiation of an appropriate proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act against the respondents/Opposite Parties No.2 to 3 for their wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.02.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No.1011 of 2024. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the counselling has been done and this petitioner has been allowed to participate in the counselling but he has not been appointed because of dearth of vacancy but this fact has been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. This requires determination. 5. In view of the above, I find no reason to entertain the present contempt petition, accordingly, the same is hereby disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to work out his further remedy in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded