Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27005 (RAJ)

SMT ANCHI W/O LATE SHRI CHANDGI RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1093/2025 · 2025-09-24

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39402-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition(Parole) No. 1093/2025 Smt Anchi W/o Late Shri Chandgi Ram, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Lamba Gothda, Police Station Bagad, District Jhunjhunu, Through Her Son, Suresh S/o Late Shri Chandgi Ram, Aged About 45 Years , Resident Of Lamba Gothda, Tehsil Chirawa, Police Station Bagad, District Jhunjhunu. (Accused Presently Confined In District Open Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Homes, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent, District Jail, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. The District Magistrate, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 24/09/2025 1. This criminal writ petition is filed aggrieved of the condition imposed of furnishing two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each and personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- for release of the petitioner on regular parole for forty days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a widow lady and her one son is facing incarceration and the other is making two ends meet by doing the labour work and she is not in a position to furnish such heavy surety bonds. [2025:RJ-JP:39402-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1093/2025] 3. Learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General relying upon the reply, submits that earlier petitioner was granted regular parole of forty days on furnishing two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and personal bond of Rs.20,000/-. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings. 5. The financial status of the petitioner is annexed with the reply as Annexure R-1. As per the financial status of the petitioner, she is widow and her son is in jail and other son is doing labour work. She has one sixth share in a joint share of 5.48 hectares. 6. Considering the financial status of the petitioner and the fact that earlier she was released on parole for forty days on furnishing two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and personal bond of Rs.20,000/-, the impugned order is modified to the extent that petitioner be released on regular parole for forty days on furnishing two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and personal bond of Rs.20,000/-. 7. The criminal writ petition (parole) is partly allowed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/88