[2025:RJ-JP:34876] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10080/2025 Meghraj S/o Shri Chanchal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 839/35, Sogara Ki Gali, Nagra, P.s. Alwar Gate, Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vishlakshi Pareek For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assitt, G.A. Mr. Devanshu Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.16/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station (Ajmer), District Ajmer (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that according to the investigation conducted by Investigating Agency, it has been alleged that till date, petitioner received Rs.50,000/- in his account. Counsel submits that parties have entered into compromise and said amount has already been returned to the complainant. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:34876] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10080/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise and submits that petitioner has returned the amount to the complainant. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the material available on record and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Meghraj S/o Shri Chanchal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not prejudice the trial in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /131