Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 26994 (RAJ)
NOOR MOHAMMED S/O ISAV v. BOARD OF REVENUE
WRES/883/2024 · 2025-04-08
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26994 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26994 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:15776] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No.883/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7178/2003
1. Noor Mohammed S/o Isav, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
2. Sher Mohammed S/o Isav, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
3. Ali Mohammed S/o Isav, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. Board Of Revenue, Ajmer (Raj.) Through Registrar.
2. Revenue Appellate Officer, Bharatpur.
3. Asst. Collector, Kaman, Distt. Deeg.
4. Chahat (Deceased), Through Legal Heirs
4.1. Kamru, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
4.2. Ayub, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
4.3. Khussi, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
4.4. Mehmood @ Jaggi, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
4.5. Noman S/o Chahat, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
4.6. Hussaini Widow Of Chahat, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
5. Idu, S/o Jodh Singh
6. Iliyas, S/o Chahat
7. Shahabuddin S/o Chahat, R/o Jotruhalla, Tehsil- Pahadi, Distt- Bharatpur (Now Deeg) (Raj.)
[2025:RJ-JP:15776] (2 of 2) [WRES-883/2024] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.D.D. Khandelwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 08/04/2025 Matter comes up on an application for restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7178/2003. Application stands allowed for the reasons stated therein. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7178/2003 is ordered to be restored to its original number. Office is directed to proceed further in this matter.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/79