" ' ^ APHC010382572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SE0 THURSDAY. THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUSl^ TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19648/2025 Between: I.Kaliya Hari Krishna, S/o Late Simhachalam aged about 43 Years Occ: Cultivation, R/o Main Road, Kanchili Village And Mandal Srikakulam District AP ...PETITIONER AND I.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its Principal Secretary Home Department A P Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi'Guntur District 2.The Director of General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District 3. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District AP 4.The SHO, Kanchili Police Station Srikakulam District AP Kanchili Village And Mandal 5.Dasaradh Prasad, S/o Syam Narayana Aged About 62 Years, R/o Baliaputtuga Colony Kanchili Village & Mandal, Srikakulam District AP e.Noria Damayanthi, W/o Late Nobino Aged about 69 years, R/o Jalantara-Manikyapuram Village, Jalantara Kota Post, Kanchili Mandal Srikakulam District AP 7. Dumm3 Savithri, W/o Janakirao Aged about 43 years, R/o Mandasasariyapilli Village, Mandasa Post & Mandal, District AP Srikakulam ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the 4'*^ respondent in interfering with the civil disputes relating to the petitioner possession and enjoyment at the instance of un-official respondent Nos.5 to 7 and their henchmen’s which was granted by way permanent injunction restraining the un-official respondent Nos 5 to 7 not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the plaint scheduled properties in favour of the petitioner in OS No.58/2011 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Judgement dated 21-04-2014 and the same was confirmed in AS No. 170/2014 which is illegal arbitrary unjust and unconstitutional and opposed to Principals of natural justice and Article 21(A) 300-A of the Constitution of India 14, 19, consequently direct the respondent matters of the petitioner land peaceful No.4 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2C)?fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with land peaceful possession and the matters of the petitioner enjoyment pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010382572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0ES [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19648/2025 Between: 1.KALIYA HARI KRISHNA, S/O.LATE SIMHACHALAM AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC;CULTIVATION, R/O.MAIN ROAD, KANCHILI VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 4.THE SHO, KANCHILI POLICE STATION KANCHILI VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 5.DASARADH PRASAD, S/O SYAM NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/0 BALIAPUTTUGA COLONY KANCHILI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 6.NORIA DAMAYANTHI, W/0 LATE NOBINO AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O JALANTARA-MANIKYAPURAM JALANTARA KOTA POST, KANCHILI MANDAL DISTRICT AP 7.DUMMA SAVITHRI, W/O JANAKIRAO AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O MANDASASARIYAPILLI VILLAGE, MANDASA POST AND MANDAL. SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the civil disputes relating to the petitioner possession and enjoyment at the instance of un-official respondent Nos.5 to 7 and their henchmens which was granted by way permanent injunction restraining the un-official respondent Nos.5 to 7 not to interfere with 2 possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the pJaint scheduled properties in favour of the petitioner in OS No.58/2011 on the lie of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Judgement dated 21-04-2014 and the same was confirmed in AS No. 170/2014 which unjust and unconstitutional and opposed to Principals of and Article 14. 19 21(A) 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct ihe respondent No.4 not to interfere with the matters of petitioner land peaceful possession and enjoyment and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.A.SRINIVASA RAC Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FCR HCME The Court made the following: ORDER: is illegal arbitrary natural justice the pass The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the follovdng relief: .... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particular!v one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning ' respondent in interfering with the civil disputes relating to the petir^oner possession and enjoyment at the instance of un-official respondent Nos 5 to 7 and their henchmens which was granted by way permanent injunction restraining the un-official respondent Nos.5 to 7 not to interfere the action of the 4th .. with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the plaint scheduled properhes in ravour of the petitioner in OS No.58/20n on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Judgement dated 21-04-2014 and the same was conrirmed in AS No.170/2014 which is illegal arbitrary unjust and unconstitutional and opposed to Principals of natural justice and Article 19, 21(A) 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the matters of the petitioner land peaceful possession and enjoyment and 1^, pass 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that respondent Police have been interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and unofficial respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions dated 05.08,2025 would submit that on receipt of phone call to police "Dial 100" respondent Police visited the disputed land where survey was conducted scene of offence. Police never interfered in the civil disputes pending between the parties. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the parties except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR )/ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, The Principal Secretary State of Andhra Pradesh, Home A P Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi Guntur 1. Department District 2. The Director of General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District 3. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District AP Kanchili Police Station Kanchili Village And Mandal 4. The SHO, Srikakulam District AP 5, One CO to V.Srinivasa Rao Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. HIGH COURT DATED:07/08/2025 ORDER WP 19648/2025 DISPOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS