HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 185 of 2025 (S/S) Soniya Devi ….......Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others …..... Respondents Present : Mr. Subhash Chand Burman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. JUDGMENT Per : Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks direction that she may be transferred from Aaganwadi Centre, Delna to Aaganwadi Centre Mundet, Block Narsan, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. The Court wanted to know from the learned counsel for the petitioner that, as to whether the post is transferable? The answer is in negative. 4. The Court further wanted to know, as to whether is it necessary for a person to be appointed as an Aaganwadi worker that he/she should be the resident of the Revenue Village, where the appointment is to be made? The answer is in affirmative. 2 5. The post is not transferable. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that Aaganwadi worker should be appointed from the same Revenue Village, where such appointment is to be made. If it is so, where is the question of transfer? There is no question of transfer. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be dismissed at the stage of admission itself. 6. The petition is dismissed in limine. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 24.02.2025 Sanjay