1 2025:CGHC:18466 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2583 of 2019 • Ramavtar Gurudwan S/o Late Vyas Narayan Gurudwan Aged About 63 Years R/o Village And Post Hardi Bazar, Police Station Chowki, Hardibazar, Tahsil Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. South Eastern Coal Field Limited Through Chief Managing Director, Head Quarter, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. South Eastern Coal Field Limited Through General Manager, S.E.C.L. Head Quarter, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Managing Director South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Dipika Area, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4. Shivcharan Prasad Rathore S/o Samaru Ram Rathore R/o Village - Utarda (Nawadih), Tahsil - Pali, Police Station (Chowki), Hardibazar, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : Ms. Aatha Shukla, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the respondent no. 1 & 2 may kindly be directed to initiate action against the respondent no. 4 in respect to get job on the basis of forged document by cheating of personation when the police has already taken cognizance for an offence under section 193, 419, 420 of IPC in the light of order passed Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 by this Hon’ble Court on dated 26.02.2019 in W.P.(Cr.) No. 116/2019. 10.2 That, the respondent no. 2 kindly be directed to initiate the equiry/action and call the explanation from the respondent no. 4 on the ground that he has obtained the service by fraud and on the basis of forged document. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Ms. Astha Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3 would submit that on complaint of the petitioner departmental enquiry has already been initiated against respondent No.4 and thus, the petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would endorse the submission made by Ms. Astha Shukla. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that departmental enquiry has already been initiated against respondent No. 4, in the opinion of this Court, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti